Template:Nonspecific: Difference between revisions
Template>Edgarde (rm Wikipedia:Relevance, non-policy) |
Template>Rich Farmbrough No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude> | |||
==Template== | |||
</noinclude> | |||
{{fix | {{fix | ||
|link=Wikipedia:Verifiability | |link=Wikipedia:Verifiability | ||
| Line 5: | Line 8: | ||
|title=The material in the vicinity of this tag may lack enough specific information to be verifiable | |title=The material in the vicinity of this tag may lack enough specific information to be verifiable | ||
|date={{{date|}}} | |date={{{date|}}} | ||
|cat=[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification]]}}<noinclude> | |cat=[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification {{#if:{{{date|}}}since {{{date}}}|}}]]}}<noinclude> | ||
<!-- The text below will not appear in the template when it is transcluded on pages. --> | <!-- The text below will not appear in the template when it is transcluded on pages. --> | ||
==Usage== | |||
This tag is for placement after purportedly [[Fact|factual]] statements that could be relevant, but are not [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|cited]] and are too general for a <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Citation needed|citeneeded]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> tag. Preferably the offending statement should be made more specific and then either cited or tagged for needing citation, but in some cases the best way to make the statement more specific may be unclear. Similarly, the statement should be deleted if determined to be unnecessary, but in some cases the outright deletion of the statement would be inappropriate or inflame [[Wikipedia:Controversial|controversy]]. | This tag is for placement after purportedly [[Fact|factual]] statements that could be relevant, but are not [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|cited]] and are too general for a <nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[Template:Citation needed|citeneeded]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki> tag. Preferably the offending statement should be made more specific and then either cited or tagged for needing citation, but in some cases the best way to make the statement more specific may be unclear. Similarly, the statement should be deleted if determined to be unnecessary, but in some cases the outright deletion of the statement would be inappropriate or inflame [[Wikipedia:Controversial|controversy]]. | ||
Revision as of 01:02, 22 July 2007
Template
[not specific enough to verify]
Usage
This tag is for placement after purportedly factual statements that could be relevant, but are not cited and are too general for a {{citeneeded}} tag. Preferably the offending statement should be made more specific and then either cited or tagged for needing citation, but in some cases the best way to make the statement more specific may be unclear. Similarly, the statement should be deleted if determined to be unnecessary, but in some cases the outright deletion of the statement would be inappropriate or inflame controversy.
This tag will categorize tagged articles into Category:Wikipedia articles needing factual verification, but not this template itself. This template is a self-reference and is part of the Wikipedia project rather than the encyclopedic content.
